Wakefield City Council (22 014 823)

Category : Transport and highways > Street furniture and lighting

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Feb 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s use of LED streetlighting and Communication Nodes in its area. This is because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to as Mr X, says the Council breached the Health and Social Care Act 2012 by not carrying out a Health Impact Assessment before fitting LED streetlighting and Communication Nodes throughout its area. He says the lighting has reduced the number of birds and pollinators and are uncomfortable on the eye, particularly when driving.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’ which we call ‘fault’. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in the decision making, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  2. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X, including the Council’s response to his complaint.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council about its decision to install LED streetlighting throughout its area.
  2. In response, the Council explained it had no evidence to suggest the LED lights had any impact on health or the environment. It said it was satisfied the lights had been tested to the required standards and that it would not making any changes to them.
  3. It is not our role to act as a point of appeal. We cannot question decisions taken by councils if they have followed the right steps and considered the relevant evidence and information. While Mr X may be disappointed with the Council’s decision, there is no evidence to suggest fault affected it.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings