Transport for London (25 012 720)

Category : Transport and highways > Public transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the issues Mr X has encountered on the bus. This is because an investigation would be unlikely to provide a worthwhile outcome for him.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained that he was forced to get off a bus and not given the opportunity to continue his journey on a bus travelling the same route.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Authority.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to TfL that he had to leave a bus after it became diverted, and he was not able to board the bus in front of him going the same way. He complained that bus drivers should only go on diversion when necessary and communicate with other bus drivers to ensure passengers’ journeys are not affected.
  2. TfL apologised for Mr X’s experience and advised that it would pass on his comments to the bus operator.
  3. Mr X remains unhappy with the situation and wants us to find TfL at fault. The Ombudsman cannot compel TfL to provide the outcome Mr X has asked for. Buses are required to be diverted for various reasons and requiring bus drivers to ensure passengers are not inconvenienced by this is not something the Ombudsman can achieve for Mr X.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because an investigation would be unlikely to provide him a worthwhile outcome for him.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings