London Borough of Islington (23 005 806)

Category : Transport and highways > Public transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 02 Oct 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a disabled persons Freedom Pass because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mrs Y complained on behalf of her husband, Mr Y, that the Council wrongly refusing him a disabled persons Freedom Pass. Mrs Y says this is causing her husband difficulty in travelling.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Mrs Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs Y has complained that the Council has refused her husband a disabled persons Freedom Pass, despite having approved his application for a blue badge. This was on the basis of a mobility assessment, completed for the blue badge application, albeit that additional documents were used after the blue badge assessment for that application to be successful.
  2. The Council has found no fault in its decision not to award a Freedom Pass to Mr Y, but it has offered to carry out a further mobility assessment to determine the outcome of the application. If we were to investigate, and found fault, we would likely ask the Council to reconsider Mr Y’s application. This would include a further assessment of Mr Y’s mobility to fully understand his circumstances at the present time, as the previous assessment would be at least ten months old.
  3. As this same remedy has been offered within the Council’s own complaint response, it is not a good use of public money to further investigate this complaint where a different outcome is unlikely to be achieved. Therefore, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs Y’s complaint because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings