Transport for London (22 012 519)

Category : Transport and highways > Public transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 Jan 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a personal injury claim. This is because the courts are better placed to consider this complaint.

The complaint

  1. Ms Y complained the Authority passed her personal injury claim to a claims management company, which has since stopped responding to her about the claim.
  2. Ms Y says she is seeking compensation for her injury and inability to work.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Ms Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms Y suffered injuries after a window latch fell on a train, hitting her head in March 2022. She reported this to the Authority, who passed her claim onto a claims management company. She says the company is now no longer in operation and she has not received responses to her contacts to the company or the Authority. She approached us in December.

Analysis

  1. The legislation from which the Ombudsman takes their power also places some restrictions on what we may investigate. One of these concerns negligence claims about damage to property or personal injury. These are legal claims which may only be determined by insurers or the courts.
  2. We are not able to decide liability or award damages. Consequently, any claim for damages, such as for a loss of income, which Ms Y considers the Council to be responsible for, are matters more appropriately dealt with by the courts. If the Authority is not responding to correspondence about the claim, it is for Ms Y to now approach the courts if she wishes to pursue her claim. We will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms Y’s complaint because the courts are better placed to consider this complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings