London Borough of Harrow (26 017 863)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 Sep 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice for an alleged traffic contravention and the Council’s handling of her complaint. It would be reasonable to expect Mrs X to use the statutory representations and appeals procedure.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X says the Council has wrongly issued a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) for an alleged traffic contravention. She says it failed to appropriately consider her complaint about the matter and has unfairly progressed enforcement whilst her complaint remains unresolved.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes limits on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. If the person has already appealed, we have no power to investigate. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.
  4. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information from Mrs X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In April 2026, the Council offered Mrs X a further opportunity to pay at a discounted rate or challenge the PCN. It advised Mrs X that if it did not receive a challenge or payment, the statutory enforcement process would continue.
  2. The Council progressed the case in September 2026.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint. If Mrs X disagrees with the PCN, it is reasonable for her to use the statutory representations and appeals procedure.
  4. We will also not investigate the Council’s complaint handling. It is not a proportionate use of resources to investigate complaint handling where we decide not to investigate the substantive matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because it is reasonable for Mrs X to use the representations and appeals procedure.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings