St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council (26 014 413)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the quality of a vehicle crossover installed by the Council. The complaint is late and there are no good reasons for us to exercise discretion to consider it now.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council installed a vehicle crossover at his home which is not of satisfactory quality.
  2. Mr X also complains the Council refused to consider his complaint.
  3. Mr X says the matter has caused him frustration.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  3. We will not usually investigate complaint handling if we are not investigating the rest of the complaint. This is because there is not usually enough injustice to justify us doing so. We collect information about particularly poor complaint handling practice and report this back to organisations. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), section 34B(8))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained the vehicle crossover installed by the Council has defects. The Council installed it in March 2025.
  2. Mr X complained to the Ombudsman in August 2026 after the Council refused to consider his complaint.
  3. As outlined in paragraph five, we cannot investigate late complaints without good reasons. A late complaint is where a person has known about the matter for more than 12 months.
  4. The available evidence suggests Mr X has known about this matter for more than 12 months. I have seen no good reasons why he could not have complained to us sooner.
  5. As there are no good reasons for us to do so, we will not exercise discretion to consider this complaint now and will not investigate.
  6. As we will not investigate the substantive matters of the complaint, we will not investigate the Council’s handling of the complaint because it is not proportionate to do so.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is late and there are no good reasons for us to exercise discretion to consider it now.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings