Salford City Council (26 010 170)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 16 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about how the Council handled two penalty charge notices she received. The Council has already provided a suitable remedy and so further investigation would achieve nothing more.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council was wrong to issue her with two penalty charge notices (PCN) for the same offence and should not have progressed her case to enforcement action.
  2. She wants an apology, a reimbursement of around £50 for costs or compensation and £250 to acknowledge the distress and anxiety she says she was caused.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X received two PCNs for the same period of parking. She paid the first but not the second. When the Council began enforcement action against the outstanding PCN, Miss X submitted a late witness statement to the Traffic Enforcement Centre to challenge this. She also complained to the Council.
  2. The Council upheld Miss X’s complaint and cancelled the outstanding PCN and enforcement action.
  3. We will not investigate this case. The Council identified where it had acted with fault and took the steps we would expect to remedy the injustice to Miss X. Any outstanding injustice is not significant enough to warrant the costs of an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint. The Council has already provided a suitable remedy and so further investigation would achieve nothing more.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings