What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Westminster City Council (26 007 425)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Jun 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr B’s complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice because he appealed to London Tribunals.

The complaint

  1. Mr B complains the Council wrongly issued him with a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) for an alleged parking contravention. Mr B complains the Council failed to respond to his specific point about the signage in this location. Mr B also complains the Council has continued to enforce this PCN despite an acknowledged procedural fault by London Tribunals. Mr B considers the Council should cancel this PCN.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr B and London Tribunals’ decision on Mr B’s appeal, which is available online.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr B put in an appeal to London Tribunals against this PCN. The Tribunal decided this PCN was properly issued. This means we cannot investigate Mr B’s complaint that this PCN was wrongly issued by the Council.
  2. Mr B complains the Tribunal Adjudicator wrongly suggested his appeal may have been AI-generated. But, this comment did not affect the Adjudicator’s clear finding that this PCN was correctly issued.
  3. And, London Tribunals did not allow Mr B’s request for a review of this decision. So, the Council is not at fault for enforcing this PCN.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr B’s complaint because he appealed to London Tribunals.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings