London Borough of Lambeth (26 005 167)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council refused his application for a parking permit. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation by the Ombudsman.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council refused his application for a parking permit. Mr X said he was approved for a permit for more than 10 years before the Council recently determined he was ineligible.
  2. Mr X said the matter caused him distress and frustration.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X received a parking permit for his area over a period of 10 years. For his most recent application, the Council found a legal restriction in place which meant Mr X was not eligible. Mr X said the Council should provide transitional parking arrangements because it previously provided parking.
  2. We will not investigate this complaint. Mr X had the benefit of a parking permit for more than 10 years when he was not technically eligible.
  3. The Ombudsman is not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong.
  4. The Council discovered the restriction and appropriately applied it to Mr X’s application. There is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s decision-making, and so we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings