Hartlepool Borough Council (26 004 905)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 Sep 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council handled reports of antisocial behaviour and conducted an antisocial behaviour case review. This is because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mr and Mrs X said the Council failed to act properly on reports of a dropped kerb obstruction. They said there were procedural failings during an antisocial behaviour (ASB) case review. They also said the Council failed to implement recommendations made by the Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner (OPCC) following their appeal.
  2. They said Mr X is being obstructed disabled access to their property. They want the Council to organise an independent review, provide an apology and compensation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr and Mrs X complained there were procedural failings during the Council’s ASB case review, and it did not implement the recommendations made by the OPCC.
  2. The Council said it did not accept the recommendations made and explained its reasons to the OPCC, which it accepted. Mr and Mrs X then requested a further antisocial behaviour case review which the Council agreed.
  3. The Council invited Mr and Mrs X to attend. On two occasions they asked the Council to delay the review, and it has organised a further date.
  4. We will not investigate this complaint. The Council has a process which Mr and Mrs X used to appeal the outcome of the case review. The Council then agreed to complete a further case review regarding similar incidents Mr and Mrs X reported. Therefore, further investigation by the Ombudsman would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings