London Borough of Ealing (26 002 387)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice issued to the complainant. The Council has now cancelled the Penalty Charge and this leaves insufficient outstanding injustice to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Ms X, complains that the Council was at fault in issuing her with a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) and failing to respond appropriately to her representations, thereby denying her the right to appeal.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X’s complaint concerns a PCN issued for an alleged moving traffic offence. She says the Council’s response to her representations was procedurally flawed, in that no Notice of Rejection was issued in response to her representations, thereby denying her the ability to use her right to appeal to London Tribunals.
  2. Ms X says the matter forms part of a pattern of aggressive targeting of her with PCNs and amounts to harassment of her as a disabled person. She further complains that the Council has failed to respond to her complaint reasonably.
  3. The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms X’s complaint. The correspondence shows that, since Ms X came to the Ombudsman the Council has accepted her representations and cancelled the PCN. There is therefore insufficient outstanding injustice caused by the Council’s actions to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is insufficient injustice to warrant our intervention.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings