London Borough of Waltham Forest (26 002 258)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mx X’s complaint about the actions taken by the Council when they failed to renew their parking permit in time. There is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation

The complaint

  1. Mx X complains about the actions the Council took when they failed to renew their parking permit in time resulting in their car being removed from outside their property.
  2. They say this caused them time and trouble, unnecessary costs, lost work and emotional distress. They want an apology and compensation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mx X did not renew their parking permit which led to the Council removing their vehicle from outside their property.
  2. We will not investigate this complaint. It was Mx X’s responsibility to renew their parking permit in time. When they were left without a permit, the Council advised them to buy a daily visitor’s pass or park elsewhere until their permit was renewed. It was open to Mx X to do so. The Council was entitled to remove their vehicle which was parked without a valid permit.
  3. As a goodwill gesture, the Council waived the removal and storage charges.
  4. Therefore, there is no worthwhile achievable from investigating this complaint because any outstanding alleged injustice is not as a result of the Council’s actions.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mx X’s complaint because there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings