Ashford Borough Council (26 002 033)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the information the Council provided on visitor parking permits. The complainant has not suffered a significant personal injustice from the alleged fault.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council wrongly told him to apply for virtual visitor parking permits when it still offers paper visitor parking permits. He also complained the first person appointed to investigate his complaint was not independent.
  2. He says this has caused him time and frustration of repeatedly having to contact the Council and attend the Council offices in person.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I appreciate that Mr X experienced frustration in getting the correct information that paper permits were still available. However, we will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. The Council has admitted it provided wrong information and apologised to Mr X. Our role is to consider complaints where the person bringing the complaint has suffered significant personal injustice as a direct result of the actions or inactions of the organisation. The injustice caused to Mr X is not significant enough to warrant further investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he has not suffered a significant personal injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings