What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Oxfordshire County Council (25 032 065)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Penalty Charge Notices for an alleged parking or traffic contravention. It would be reasonable to expect the complainant to use the statutory representations and appeals procedure. It is also reasonable to expect the complainant to apply to the Traffic Enforcement Centre to seek to regain their appeal rights where lost, and then to appeal to a tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mr X says the Council did not act reasonably in how enforcement was managed or how his complaint was handled. He says there were eight Penalty Charge Notices (PCNs), but enforcement was pursued under multiple cases with 12 case references. He says this caused confusion and led to escalation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes limits on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court or use a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court or appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26(6)(a) and (c), as amended)
  3. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for the rest of England. The Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC), part of the county court, considers applications to set the PCN process back where there has been procedural fault.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information from the complainant and the Council, and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because it would be reasonable for the complainant to use the representations and appeals procedure.
  2. It is also reasonable to expect the complainant to apply to the Traffic Enforcement Centre to regain their appeal rights where lost, and they may then appeal if the TEC agrees.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings