What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Transport for London (25 032 049)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the enforcement of a Penalty Charge Notice. Mr X used his right to appeal the matter to the Traffic Enforcement Centre.

The complaint

  1. Mr X says the Authority failed to follow the correct procedure for a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) and denied them their right to appeal against it. They say the matter has wrongly progressed through the enforcement procedure.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes limits on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court or use a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court or appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26(6)(a) and (c), as amended)
  3. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for the rest of England. The Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC), part of the county court, considers applications to set the PCN process back where there has been procedural fault.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information from the complainant and the Authority, and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X said the Authority sent a PCN to his neighbour’s address and not his own in error. When Mr X was informed about the issue, he appealed to the Traffic Enforcement Centre and made a statutory declaration that he had not received the PCN. The representations were accepted by the TEC. In response to the Ombudsman’s enquiries, the Authority said it will re-issue the PCN once it receives the revoking order from the TEC.
  2. Once Mr X receives the PCN, it will be open to him to pay the charge or contest it through the appeals process and, ultimately, the London Tribunals.
  3. Because Mr X used his right to appeal the matter to the TEC, the law says we cannot investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate this complaint because the complainant has applied to the Traffic Enforcement Centre.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings