London Borough of Barnet (25 031 068)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to refuse Mr X’s request to extend double yellow lines. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s decision to refuse his request to extend double yellow lines. He says this affects him being able to safely get onto his road. Mr X wants the Council to approve this request.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council considered Mr X’s request and acknowledged parking pressures on the road. It decided extending the double yellow lines was unlikely to resolve the problem, as it would probably displace parking to nearby streets. It considered a controlled parking zone would be a more appropriate way to manage parking across the wider area. The Council told Mr X it would add this to its programme if residents submitted a petition showing support for a controlled parking zone.
  2. There is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s decision-making. It considered Mr X’s request, explained why it did not consider extending the double yellow lines would resolve the issue, and identified a controlled parking zone as a possible alternative. It is open to Mr X and other residents to pursue that option by submitting a petition to the Council.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings