London Borough of Lambeth (25 027 455)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council issuing her a Penalty Charge Notice for an alleged parking contravention. It would be reasonable to expect Ms X to appeal the Penalty Charge Notice.

The complaint

  1. Ms X said the Council prevented her from obtaining a resident parking permit outside her home and then unfairly issued her a parking charge notice (PCN). She said the Council refused to cancel the PCN following her complaint. Ms X said the matter caused her distress. She wants the Council to cancel the parking charge notice and to provide her with a financial remedy for the injustice caused.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes limits on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. If the person has already appealed we have no power to investigate. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for the rest of England.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information from Ms X and the Council and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In response to Ms X’s complaint, the Council informed Ms X it correctly issued the PCN because she did not complete the application for a resident parking permit which she had the option to do so and she did not pay for street parking either.
  2. We will not investigate this complaint as it would be reasonable for Ms X to appeal to tribunal. There is no evidence which indicates it would not be reasonable for Ms X to do so.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because it would be reasonable for Ms X to appeal to tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings