What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

London Borough of Ealing (25 027 139)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate most of Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s failure to provide information he requested because the Information Commissioner’s Office is better suited to consider the matter. We will not investigate the Council’s complaint handling because the tests in our Assessment Code are not met.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council failed to:
      1. respond to his request for information; and
      2. provide a full and final response to his complaints.
  2. Mr X said the matter caused him distress, frustration, and uncertainty.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

Request for information

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s primary complaint about the Council’s response to his request for information.
  2. Mr X submitted a Freedom of Information (FOI) request to the Council to obtain the information he wanted. If Mr X is dissatisfied with the Council’s response, he can take the matter to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO).
  3. Parliament created the ICO to consider complaints about FOI requests. It is reasonable to expect Mr X to take the matter to the ICO because it is the statutory body best placed to decide whether the Councils has complied with its duties to provide the information Mr X seeks.

Complaints handling

  1. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures if we decide not to investigate the substantive issue. Consequently, we will not investigate this complaint because the tests in our Assessment Code are not met.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate most of Mr X’s complaint because the Information Commissioner’s Office is better suited to consider the matter. We will not investigate the remainder because the tests in our Assessment Code are not met.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings