What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council (25 026 306)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council failing to properly assess the current usability of Mrs X’s driveway access. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council failed to properly assess the current usability of her driveway access and instead relied on historical conditions about access protection markings outside her property. Mrs X says the continued obstruction of her driveway makes it difficult to safely access and exit her property. She said this has caused ongoing inconvenience and stress.
  2. Mrs X wants the Council to carry out an onsite assessment of the current access and provide an evidence-based explanation for its decision.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council installed access protection markings outside Mrs X’s property in 2022. Mrs X says vehicles have parked across the unmarked part of the dropped kerb, restricting her visibility when leaving her driveway. She said the existing markings were aligned to an incorrectly positioned boundary fence. The Council said its review of historical images showed the existing markings were correctly installed in line with a pillar on Mrs X’s property, which has since been removed.
  2. Mrs X says the problem began in November 2025, after changes to her vehicle access. The Council explained it is not obliged to extend the marking because of later changes to the property access. There is also no further requirement of the Council to assess the current markings. Mrs X can apply to extend the markings which is the correct process to follow. There is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings