What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

London Borough of Croydon (25 025 791)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the enforcement of two Penalty Charge Notices. Mr X has applied to the Traffic Enforcement Centre and we cannot investigate.

The complaint

  1. Mr X says the Council failed to follow the correct procedure for a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) and wrongly progressed recovery action because the Council had used an incorrect address. The enforcement agent seized his car, and he was forced to pay the agent’s fees. This caused him distress and anxiety.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes limits on what we can investigate.
  2. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for the rest of England. The Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC), part of the county court, considers applications to set the PCN process back where there has been procedural fault.
  3. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal or a government minister or started court action about the matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6), as amended).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information from the complainant and the Council, and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council issued two PCNs to Mr X in 2025. It progressed to enforcement action as Mr X did not pay or appeal. The agent removed Mr X’s car and he paid the charge.
  2. Mr X then filed an out of time witness statement to the TEC which was allowed.
  3. The Council checked the address it obtained from the DVLA and found it was incomplete. The Council recalled the account and arranged a refund. It then reissued the PCNs to the correct address. Mr X paid both PCNs at the discounted rate. The Council has since refunded one PCN due to a court ruling which led to the removal of a the Low Traffic Neighbourhood (LTN) scheme.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate this complaint because the complainant applied to the Traffic Enforcement Centre to regain his appeal rights.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings