London Borough of Bexley (25 023 388)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of a Penalty Charge Notice. This is because he has appealed the matter to the Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s handling of a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN). He says the Council failed to ensure and evidence proper service of its rejection to his online challenge. He also complains about the Council’s handling of his complaint about the matter.
  2. Mr X says the matter caused him avoidable time and distress. He wants the Council to review it procedures for issuing notices and train its complaint handling staff. He also wants the Council to provide him an appropriate remedy and reconsider enforcement action.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. London Tribunals considers appeals about PCNs within London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X.
  2. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X appealed the PCN to London Tribunals claiming he had not received the Council’s rejection letter to his informal challenge. London Tribunals was satisfied there was no procedural impropriety in this case. We therefore cannot investigate this aspect of Mr X’s complaint because he has appealed to London Tribunals
  2. As a publicly funded body we must be careful how we use our resources. We conduct proportionate investigations; completing them when we consider we have enough evidence to make a sound decision. This means we do not try to answer every single question a complainant may have about what the organisation did. As we are not investigating the substantive issue of this complaint, it is not a good use of public resources to investigate the complaint handling in isolation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint because he has appealed the matter to the Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings