London Borough of Brent (25 021 662)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 01 Apr 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of a penalty charge notice. This is because it was reasonable for her to use her right of appeal.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains about the Council’s handling of a penalty charge notice (PCN). She says the Council treated her formal representations as an informal challenge and did not respond within the statutory timeframe. She believes this delay means the PCN should have been cancelled.
  2. Mrs X says she paid the PCN under duress. She says the matter caused her distress and anxiety and she wants the Council to refund the PCN amount.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law also says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals within London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. If Mrs X disagreed with the PCN, or believed there were errors in how the Council dealt with it, she could have appealed to London Tribunals. Only London Tribunals can decide whether the PCN was issued correctly and whether any procedural errors mean it should be cancelled.
  2. I have seen no evidence to suggest it would have been unreasonable for Mrs X to use her right of appeal. The fact that she has paid the PCN, and has now lost her right of appeal, does not mean it was unreasonable for her to appeal at the time. Therefore, I will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it would have been reasonable for her to use her right of appeal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings