London Borough of Brent (25 021 605)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice for an alleged parking contravention. The complainant has used the statutory representations and appeals procedure.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council failed to serve her with a Notice of Rejection, to her appeal against a parking penalty charge notice (PCN), within the statutory time frame of 56 days. As such, Mrs X considers the Council should refund the £265 she paid it to release her vehicle and cancel the PCN.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes limits on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for the rest of England.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information from the complainant and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Parliament has provided an appeal mechanism for motorists to challenge PCNs. One of the appeal grounds for an appeal is ‘procedural impropriety’. This is what Mrs X alleges, and she could have raised this matter as part of the appeal she made against the parking PCN to London Tribunals. We are not another level of appeal nor are we empowered to make the decisions the London Tribunals can. As such, we cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint because, in doing so, we would overlap with the role of the London Tribunals to decide on the issue which could have been referred to it to resolve. The restriction in paragraph three above applies.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate this complaint because the complainant has already used the representations and appeals procedure.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings