London Borough of Harrow (25 020 184)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Apr 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about how the Council have approached parking enforcement on his road. There is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council has given misleading information about how it will deal with vehicles that have multiple Penalty Charge Notices (PCN).

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says the Council made a social media post abut a new approach to towing vehicles that have received multiple PCNs. Mr X says the Council do not have a vehicle capable of towing vans and have not towed vehicles on his road which he believes meet the criteria.
  2. The Council contacted Mr X and clarified its approach to dealing with vehicles with multiple Penalty Charge Notices. The Council say it has introduced a tow vehicle to remove vehicles that have multiple Penalty Charge Notices, depending on the size and mass of the vehicle.
  3. The Councils enforcement practices are consistent with the applicable traffic management legislation and policy frameworks. There is no evidence to suggest the Council is not taking any action where a PCN has been issued. There is therefore insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s approach to parking enforcement to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings