Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (25 016 796)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a refused dropped kerb application. This is because we are unlikely to find fault with the Council’s decision.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains about the Council’s decision to refuse her application for a vehicle crossover, also known as a dropped kerb. She says the refusal poses a safety risk for her family and she wants the Council to reconsider the application or offer an alternative solution.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X.
  2. I considered the relevant council policy.
  3. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Ombudsman is not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong, regardless of whether you disagree with the decision the organisation made.
  2. The Council has explained to Mrs X how it applied its policy when it refused her application. I am satisfied the Council considered Mrs X’s circumstances and the policy before it decided to refuse her application, and that the decision follows the policy. It is therefore unlikely we would find fault in the way the Council made its decision.
  3. While I appreciate other residents on the road may have dropped kerbs which would not be approved under the current policy, this does not show any fault by the Council and does not amount to an injustice to Mrs X.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find fault with the Council’s decision to refuse her application.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings