Birmingham City Council (25 009 445)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 01 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice. This is because it is a late complaint and because the complainant could have appealed to the tribunal.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains about a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) he received for late payment of the charge to enter the clean air zone. He wants the Council to remove the fine.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  4. The Traffic Penalty Tribunal considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for all areas of England outside London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X. I also considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council issued Mr X with a PCN in November 2023. Mr X challenged the fine.
  2. The Council rejected his challenge in January 2024. The Council said he could pay the fine or appeal to the tribunal within 28 days.
  3. Mr X complained to us about the PCN in July 2025.
  4. I will not start an investigation because this is a late complaint. Mr X has been aware of the PCN since 2023 but did not complain to us until July 2025. I have not seen any good reason to accept a late complaint.
  5. I also will not start an investigation because Mr X could have appealed to the tribunal. It is reasonable to expect him to appeal because the tribunal is the correct body to consider appeals about PCNs. If appropriate, the tribunal has the power to cancel a PCN – we do not have that power.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not start an investigation because this is a late complaint and because Mr X could have appealed to the tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings