Westminster City Council (25 004 168)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice because the complainant could have followed the statutory process and appealed to the tribunal.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Ms X, wants the Council to waive a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN).

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X. I also considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council issued Ms X with a PCN for parking on double yellow lines.
  2. Ms X challenged the fine and said she had to park to collect some life-saving medication that she had forgotten to take to work. Ms X says there was nowhere else to park.
  3. The Council rejected Ms X’s challenge and said the yellow lines are enforced at all times and she should have found alternative parking. The Council offered Ms X another chance to pay the PCN at the discounted rate or said she could wait for Notice to Owner (NTO) and make a formal challenge.
  4. I will not start an investigation because Ms X could waited for the NTO and followed the statutory process. She could have used the NTO to lodge a formal challenge and then appealed to the tribunal if the Council rejected the formal challenge. It is reasonable to expect Ms X to do this because it is the process set up by parliament to facilitate PCNs disputes and the tribunal is the correct organisation to decide if a PCN has been issued correctly or should be cancelled.
  5. We are not an appeal body and have no power to waive or cancel a PCN.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because Ms X could have followed the statutory process and appealed to the tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings