Colchester City Council (25 002 806)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice because these matters have an alternative legal remedy, and it is reasonable to expect Mr X to use this alternative remedy. .

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained that he mistakenly received a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN). Mr X said that his car has been cloned, which he has reported to both the police and the Driving and Vehicle Licensing Agency.
  2. Mr X wants the Council to waive the PCN and end the debt recovery action that has started.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council issued Mr X with a PCN for a parking contravention.
  2. The Council attached the PCN to the car. Later, the Council posted the Notice to Owner (NtO) and Charge Notice to the address where the car was registered.
  3. Mr X said that he did not receive the NtO and Charge Notice.
  4. Mr X disputes the PCN, saying he is not using the car and has not visited that area.
  5. After Mr X complained to us, he filed an out-of-time Witness Statement with the Traffic Enforcement Centre.
  6. I will not start an investigation because Mr X has engaged the statutory process as part of his alternative legal remedy. It is reasonable to expect Mr X to do this and have carried on with that process because it is the process set up by parliament to facilitate PCN disputes. The tribunal is the correct organisation to decide if a PCN has been issued correctly or should be cancelled.
  7. We are not an appeal body and have no power to waive or cancel a PCN.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because Mr X has an alternative legal remedy, and it is reasonable to expect him to use it.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings