London Borough of Harrow (25 001 827)
Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 10 Jun 2025
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to issue him with Penalty Charge Notices or about alleged discrepancies in the appeals process. This is because Mr X appealed to a Tribunal, and the law says we cannot investigate.
The complaint
- Mr X complained the Council issued him with multiple Penalty Charge Notices (PCNs) and about procedural discrepancies in the appeals process.
- Mr X said the matter caused him time and trouble and frustration.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
- We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
- London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by the complainant.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint. This is because Mr X appealed to the London Tribunals about the validity of the PCNs the Council issued.
- The law says the Ombudsman has no discretion to investigate matters taken to a Tribunal. This is the case even if the appeal does not provide a full remedy for the issues complained about. Although Mr X said he had to go to time and trouble to resolve the matter, the law says we cannot investigate.
Final decision
- We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint because he appealed to a Tribunal.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman