Hertfordshire County Council (25 000 865)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint about the Council’s refusal of his dropped kerb application. This is because the information does not indicate the Council’s decision was affected by fault.

The complaint

  1. Mr B complains the Council wrongly refused his application for a dropped kerb. Mr B says his off-street parking area is only 21cm short of the Council’s minimum depth requirement. Mr B considers the Council’s decision was not proportionate and the Council has not suggested changes he could make. Mr B also says other crossovers nearby have been approved by the Council.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr B and the Council’s dropped kerb policy.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Like most highways authorities the Council will only allow a dropped kerb if the off-street parking area meets minimum size requirements. This is for highway safety reasons and because property and vehicle ownership changes over time. It is not our role to tell the Council it is wrong to operate such a policy
  2. The Council has applied its policy to Mr B’s application. I have not seen any information to indicate the Council’s decision was affected by fault.
  3. When the Council’s dropped kerb criteria are not met, it is not the responsibility of the Council to provide a solution to a person’s need for off-street parking.
  4. Dropped kerbs nearby may be unauthorised or approved under previous Council policies. But, even if other dropped kerbs have been wrongly approved by the Council in the past, we would not criticise the Council for applying its policy correctly to Mr B’s application.
  5. So, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because the information does not indicate the Council’s decision was affected by fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings