Southend-on-Sea City Council (24 023 305)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a dropped kerb opposite the complainant’s home. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mrs X, complains the Council gave permission for a dropped kerb to be built opposite her home. Mrs X says this will make it hard for her to park outside her home and the new dropped kerb was not needed. Mrs X wants the Council to remove the dropped kerb.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council. This includes photographs and the complaint correspondence. I also considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council gave consent for a dropped kerb opposite Mrs X’s home. Mrs X has a dropped kerb and driveway, but says the neighbour’s dropped kerb will make it hard for her to park on the road. Mrs X complained to the Council and said officers did not properly consider the application. She said the new dropped kerb was not needed.
  2. In response, a manager visited the site and confirmed the dropped kerb had been correctly approved and assessed against the current criteria. The Council explained the application is compliant with the policy. The Council addressed the points Mrs X raised about the new crossover and the problems she thinks will be caused.
  3. I will not start an investigation because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. The Council responded correctly by visiting the site, checking that the application had been correctly approved, and addressing Mrs X’s concerns and questions. Mrs X disagrees with the Council’s approach but that does not mean there has been administrative fault.
  4. We are not an appeal body and we cannot intervene simply because a council makes a decision that someone disagrees with. We can only ask a council to act if there is evidence of fault and, in this case, there is no suggestion of fault.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings