Bristol City Council (24 023 049)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 19 May 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s conduct while dealing with her appeal against a penalty charge notice. This is because the Council has apologised and offered a suitable remedy for the injustice its actions caused Mrs X.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council referred to her in a derogatory way in its response to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal about an appeal against a penalty charge notice (PCN). She says this caused her shock and distress and she had to spend time on the phone during her holiday to respond to the Tribunal.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X’s representative, Mr Y.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council acknowledges the upset its actions caused Mrs X and has agreed to cancel the PCN as a gesture of goodwill. This provides the best possible outcome Mrs X could have hoped for when she made her appeal but she believes she would have won if the Council had not cancelled the PCN. The Council has therefore offered to reissue the PCN, allowing Mrs X a further opportunity to test this at appeal, and if Mrs X chooses to go down this route it has agreed to pay her £50 for the impact its actions had on her.
  2. Where we find fault we may recommend a remedy. Such remedies aim to put the person complaining back in the position they would have been, had the fault not occurred. Where this is not possible, such as in this case, we may recommend a modest financial payment to acknowledge the impact of the fault on the person complaining.
  3. In this case the Council’s offer provides a suitable remedy for the injustice caused to Mrs X and it is therefore unlikely further investigation would achieve anything more for her.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because the Council has provided a suitable remedy for the impact of its actions on Mrs X.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings