Westminster City Council (24 021 075)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about damage Mrs X says the Council caused to her vehicle. The matter is best dealt with as an insurance claim, ultimately through the courts if necessary.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained about damage caused to her vehicle when the Council moved her car. She says it carried out roadworks without sufficient notice for her to move her car herself. She said the Council had not been responding to her contact and had offered an insufficient settlement. She said the matter had caused distress and she had been unable to use her vehicle. She wanted the Council to fix the car or pay her the full amount necessary (£2,500-£3,000) to have it fixed.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X’s complaint to us is about damage she says the Council’s contractor caused to her vehicle when moving it to commence roadworks.
  2. It is not the role of the Ombudsman to assess economic losses. When a person’s primary aim is compensation for damage, we will normally signpost them to the courts as the appropriate route to obtain a remedy.
  3. There is not a good reason in this case for us to consider the matter instead. While we normally expect Councils and their insurers to respond properly to communication and expedite matters through their processes efficiently, we will not generally investigate a complaint about this when the matter is ultimately one for the courts.
  4. Given that Mrs X says the Council and its insurers have not responded to her attempts to resolve the matter and have not provided a suitable settlement, it is open to Mrs X to lodge the matter with the courts with the assistance of her insurance company. We will not investigate the matter instead as the courts are best placed to deal with the matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because it is a matter for the insurance process, and ultimately court if necessary.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings