London Borough of Lewisham (24 020 542)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 31 Mar 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about Penalty Charge Notices because Mr Y has already used his right to appeal to the Traffic Enforcement Centre.

The complaint

  1. Mr Y complained he has not received over 30 Penalty Charge Notices (PCNs) from the Council and the Council has then enforced the PCNs unfairly. He is also unhappy with the Council’s response to his complaint, where it has not suggested any alternative means of ensuring he receives any further PCNs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has started court action about the matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  3. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Mr Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The law which gives us the power to investigate complaints also prevents us from investigating where a person has begun court action. In this case, Mr Y has appealed the pursuit of the PCNs he has complained about to the Traffic Enforcement Centre.
  2. The Traffic Enforcement Centre is based at Northampton County Court. Consequently, as he has started court action about the matter, we cannot investigate as we do not have the power to do so.
  3. While Mr Y may have found the Council’s response unhelpful, the Council is not required to arrange for further methods, other than by post to the address a vehicle is registered to with the DVLA, of delivery of PCNs or enforcement correspondence. However, as we are not able to investigate the substantive matter, it is not a good use of public funds for us to investigate how the Council dealt with Mr Y’s complaint. Therefore, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr Y’s complaint because he has already used his right to appeal to the Traffic Enforcement Centre.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings