Sheffield City Council (24 018 841)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Mar 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of a penalty charge notice. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains he did not receive a penalty charge notice (PCN) from the Council and did not therefore have the opportunity to pay the PCN at the discounted rate of £60. The Council escalated the case as a result of Mr X’s non-payment and Mr X’s partner has now paid it at an increased rate of £190. Mr X wants the Council to refund the difference.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. When considering complaints we make findings based on the balance of probabilities. This means that we look at the available relevant evidence and decide what was more likely to have happened.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X is clearly frustrated that he did not have the opportunity to pay the PCN at the discounted rate but we could not show, on balance, that this was the result of any fault by the Council. There is no requirement for the Council to send PCNs by registered post or to prove delivery, and it is therefore just as likely that the issue results from failures in the postal service rather than any fault by the Council.
  2. The Council has discretion to cancel PCNs or to reduce the amount of a PCN in any circumstances, but it is for the Council to decide whether and when to use it. The Council’s correspondence with Mr X shows it considered whether to exercise its discretion in this case but decided not to, and there is no basis for us to question or criticise its decision.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings