Devon County Council (24 012 427)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Oct 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice she received for an alleged parking contravention. This is because it was reasonable for Mrs B to put in an appeal to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mrs B complains the Council wrongly issued her with a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) for an alleged parking contravention. Mrs B says the parking restrictions in this location are not clearly signed.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The Traffic Penalty Tribunal considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for all areas of England outside London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We do not normally investigate a complaint that a PCN should not have been issued. This is because there is a statutory representations and appeals procedure which we generally expect a motorist to use.
  2. After receiving a Notice to Owner, the motorist may put in formal representations to the authority which issued the PCN.
  3. If the authority rejects these representations, the motorist may put in an appeal to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal (for local authorities outside London). The tribunal is independent and has the power to cancel a PCN.
  4. Rather than pay this PCN, Mrs B could have used this process to challenge the PCN. The Council told Mrs B about this process.
  5. I have not seen any information to suggest it was unreasonable for Mrs B to put in formal representations, and if needed, appeal to the tribunal.
  6. So, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint because it was reasonable for her to put in an appeal to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal if needed.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings