Transport for London (24 011 348)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Oct 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint that Transport for London failed to respond to her representations against a penalty charge notice. This is because it would have been reasonable for Mrs X to apply to the Traffic Enforcement Centre, which is part of Northampton County Court, to make a statutory declaration.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mrs X, complains Transport for London (TfL) did not respond to her representations against a penalty charge notice (PCN).

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  3. The Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC) is part of Northampton County Court. It considers applications from local authorities to pursue payment of unpaid PCNs and from motorists to challenge local authorities’ pursuit of unpaid PCNs.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Where a motorist makes representations against a PCN but does not receive a response they may apply to the TEC to make a statutory declaration. If successful, the TEC may order TfL to take the process back to an earlier stage, removing the basis for any additional charges and reinstating the motorist’s right of appeal.
  2. Mrs X confirms she received an ‘order for recovery’ from TfL and this set out her right to go to the TEC. It would therefore have been reasonable for her to make a statutory declaration if she wished to challenge TfL’s escalation of the case. The TEC’s decisions are binding on both parties and the process for making a statutory declaration is free and relatively simple to use.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because it would have been reasonable for Mrs X to apply to the TEC to make a statutory declaration.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings