London Borough of Lambeth (24 009 991)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Oct 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Penalty Charge Notices for parking contraventions. It was reasonable for Ms X to use her statutory right of appeal to London Tribunals.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained the Council issued her two Penalty Charge Notices (PCNs) while she was awaiting renewal of her blue badge. She said delays by the Department for Work and Pensions meant her blue badge renewal was delayed. She said the Council failed to consider her circumstances, refused her appeal and passed the PCNs to enforcement agents.
  2. Ms X said the matter has caused her significant distress and financial hardship, with subsequent impacts on her health. She wanted the Council to cancel the PCNs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X’s complaint is about two PCNs the Council issued while she was awaiting renewal of her blue badge. She appealed the matter to the Council, and it issued her a notice of rejection which explained she could submit her appeal to London Tribunals upon receiving a notice to owner.
  2. When someone has a statutory right of appeal, we will generally not investigate a complaint about the matter as it is usually reasonable for the person to use this process. It is free, relatively informal and simple to use, and the adjudicator's decision is legally binding on both parties.
  3. We do not have the power to cancel a PCN. The Tribunal can consider mitigating circumstances such as those Ms X claimed, and there is not a good reason for us to consider a complaint about the matter instead.
  4. Given that the PCNs remained unpaid and not successfully appealed, the Council progressed them to enforcement in line with the statutory process.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because it was reasonable for her to use her statutory right of appeal to London Tribunals.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings