London Borough of Havering (24 009 716)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Sep 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about illegal parking on Miss B’s road. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Miss B says the Council issued her with a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN), which she paid, for not parking her car wholly within a marked bay near her home. Miss B complains there are often many cars which are blocking driveways or not parked wholly within bays but they do not receive PCNs. Miss B says she regularly cannot park on her road because non-residents park everywhere and illegally. Miss B says the Council should introduce a residents permit scheme so residents can park close to their home.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss B and the Council. I have also considered information on the Council’s website.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council did not accept Miss B’s complaint under the Council’s complaints procedure. The Council said Miss B could have challenged the PCN she was issued by using the statutory representations and appeals procedure.
  2. Miss B says the Council misunderstood her complaint because she was not challenging the PCN issued to her. Rather, she was complaining that the Council does not issue PCNs to other parked cars which are parked illegally.
  3. I find the Council could have done more to explain its approach to parking enforcement on Miss B’s road. But, an investigation by the Ombudsman is not justified.
  4. The Council has told Miss B how to report illegal parking via the Council’s website. This information may help the Council tackle illegal parking on Miss B’s road.
  5. Miss B may also use the Freedom of Information Act to ask the Council for specific information about how it enforces the parking restrictions on her road.
  6. Miss B would like the Council to introduce a residents permit scheme. There is a legal process the Council must follow before introducing such a scheme. Also, it is for the Council to decide whether such a scheme is justified in a particular location. Miss B may suggest this to the Council using the parking general enquiry form on the Council’s website.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss B’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings