London Borough of Southwark (24 008 970)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Sep 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Penalty Charge Notices. It was reasonable for Ms X to use her statutory right of appeal to a tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained about Penalty Charge Notices (PCNs) she says the Council issued in error, and subsequent enforcement action. She said the matter caused distress, a financial impact and inconvenience. She wanted the Council to cancel the PCNs, cease enforcement action, correct its records and make service improvements.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference, or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X’s parking permit expired in early 2024. She tried to renew her permit on two occasions and provided evidence the Council requested. While waiting for the Council to process her permit renewal, she received a number of PCNs.
  2. The Council waived some of the PCNs, but told Ms X it was her responsibility to renew her parking permit and she was therefore responsible for the remaining PCNs. The Council acknowledged delays in its response during the complaints procedure and offered Ms X £50.00 to recognise the impact this had on her.
  3. London Tribunals deal with PCN appeals within London. It was reasonable for
    Ms X to use her statutory right to appeal. The process is free, relatively informal and simple to use, and the decision is legally binding on both parties. We cannot cancel a PCN like the tribunal can.
  4. The Council cancelled some of the PCNs, but others remained unpaid and unchallenged. The Council therefore progressed to enforcement action, in line with the statutory process.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because it was reasonable for her to appeal the PCNs to London Tribunals.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings