Plymouth City Council (24 008 622)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Sep 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the provision of a temporary parking permit. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains the road the Council has nominated for his parking permit is unsuitable. Mr X wants the Council to change or enlarge the area where he can use the permit.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X. This includes the complaint correspondence. I also considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X lives in a building where the residents are not eligible for parking permits.
  2. The building is having essential repairs done and the residents cannot use the private parking. The Council liaised with the building managers and decided to provide temporary parking permits while the private parking cannot be used.
  3. The Council issued Mr X with a temporary permit to park in road A. Mr X says road A is unsuitable. He complained to the Council and asked for a permit which would allow him to park elsewhere.
  4. In response, the Council explained why it had issued temporary permits and said that, while it appreciates Mr X would like a permit that covers a different street, it must balance the needs of temporary permit holders with the needs of residents with a permanent permit. The Council said it would not change the validity of Mr X’s temporary permit.
  5. Mr X remains of the view that the Council should offer a permit for a different street and he disagrees with the reasons given by the Council for not changing the location.
  6. I will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. The Council acted appropriately by issuing a temporary permit and considering Mr X’s for a different location. But it is not required to agree to every request made by a resident. We are not an appeal body and we cannot intervene simply because a council makes a decision that someone disagrees with.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings