London Borough of Merton (24 005 114)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Jul 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr B’s complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice for an alleged parking contravention. This is because Mr B appealed to London Tribunals.

The complaint

  1. Mr B complains the Council wrongly issued him with a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) for an alleged parking contravention. Mr B says there are signs in this location which indicate to motorists they can park after 7pm. Mr B would like the Council to refund the £130 he paid to cancel this PCN plus compensation for his time pursuing the matter. Mr B would also like the Council to take disciplinary action against the officers involved.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr B and London Tribunals’ decision on Mr B’s appeal against this PCN which is available online.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We generally expect a motorist to challenge a PCN by making representations to the local authority and if needed, putting in an appeal to London Tribunals (for PCNs issued in London).
  2. The tribunal is independent and in the best position to decide whether a PCN was properly issued. The tribunal has the power to cancel a PCN.
  3. If this right of appeal has been used we have no discretion to investigate a complaint about a PCN.
  4. Mr B put in an appeal to London Tribunals against this PCN. The tribunal considered the issue Mr B complains about and was satisfied that a contravention occurred and the signage was adequate. The tribunal refused Mr B’s appeal.
  5. Because Mr B put in an appeal to London Tribunals this means we do not have the power to investigate his complaint about this PCN.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr B’s complaint because he put in an appeal to London Tribunals.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings