Transport for London (23 010 089)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Oct 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice because it is reasonable to expect Miss Y to appeal to the London Tribunals.

The complaint

  1. Miss Y complained the Authority unlawfully issued her with twoPenalty Charge Notices (PCNs).
  2. Miss Y says this means she is now expected to pay a penalty which has unlawfully been charged.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Miss Y and the Authority and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Authority issued two PCNs to Miss Y after she drove in the Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) without paying the daily charge. Miss Y says the ULEZ charges are unlawful, and she should not be charged for driving in the area. She considers the PCNs to therefore be unlawful and illegal. She made representations to the Authority, but the Authority sent her a Notice of Rejection of the representations on 12 October. Miss Y then approached us.

Analysis

  1. Miss Y has the right to appeal to the London Tribunals. She can do this within 28 days of the Notice of Rejection from the Authority. This will end shortly. As this is free initially, is the prescribed legal route to challenge the PCNs and reasonable adjustments can be made if needed, so we would consider this reasonable to expect Miss Y to do. We will therefore not investigate.
  2. If Miss Y misses this deadline however, she may need to approach the Traffic Enforcement Centre based at Northampton County Court to ask it accept an application from her to reinstate her right to appeal to the London Tribunals, which cannot be guaranteed.
  3. As Miss Y has a right of appeal to the London Tribunals, and it is reasonable to expect her to use this right, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss Y’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect Miss Y to appeal to the London Tribunals.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings