What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

London Borough of Harrow (23 007 732)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Sep 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr Y’s complaint about a penalty charge notice issued by the Council. This is because Mr Y has used his right of appeal to London Tribunals.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains about a penalty charge notice (PCN) issued to his son, Mr Y, for failing to comply with a keep left/right sign. He says the Council’s signage is inadequate and that the Council encouraged Mr Y to appeal and did not make clear that if his appeal was unsuccessful he would have to pay the full penalty charge of £130.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal about the same matter. We may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal but cannot investigate if the person has already appealed. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Because Mr Y has appealed against the PCN we cannot investigate any complaint about it, as set out at Paragraph 2.
  2. As part of Mr Y’s appeal the Adjudicator considered the adequacy of the Council’s signs and the amount of the PCN and was satisfied the contravention occurred, there were no mitigating factors which would warrant cancellation of the PCN and that the Council made Mr Y aware the penalty charge would revert to the full amount of £130 in the event his appeal was unsuccessful.
  3. While Mr X is also unhappy about the way the Council dealt with his complaint the courts have said that where we cannot investigate a complaint about the main or underlying issue, we cannot normally investigate related issues either. (R (on the application of M) v Commissioner for Local Administration in England [2006] EWHC 2847 (Admin)). We cannot therefore investigate whether the Council properly considered his complaint about the PCN and the Council’s signage.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate this complaint. This is because Mr Y has used his right of appeal to London Tribunals.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings