London Borough of Haringey (22 017 880)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 Mar 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice because the complainant appealed to the tribunal. The complainant can also contact the Information Commissioner.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I refer to as Mr X, complains about a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) for a moving traffic offence. He says his usual route was blocked due to an accident and he was forced into a restricted area. Mr X also says the Council will not release CCTV which would prove he had to drive into the area. Mr X wants a £130 refund and compensation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.
  4. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X. I also read the decision made by the tribunal and considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council issued a PCN for driving into a pedestrian zone. Mr X appealed to the tribunal and said he was forced to enter the area due to an accident. The tribunal dismissed the appeal and directed Mr X to pay £130.
  2. Mr X paid the fine but continues to dispute it. He asked the Council for CCTV. The Council said the CCTV team had reported there were no incidents. The Council also said it cannot release CCTV due to data protection and said the footage had been deleted as more than 28 days had passed.
  3. The law says we cannot investigate a complaint when the matter has been appealed to the tribunal. Mr X appealed to the tribunal so I cannot start an investigation and cannot ask the Council to issue a refund or compensation. This restriction applies even though Mr X continues to dispute the PCN.
  4. The Council has explained why it cannot provide the CCTV footage Mr X requested. If Mr X disagrees with the Council’s response he can complain to the Information Commissioner (ICO). It is reasonable to expect him to do this because the ICO is the appropriate body to consider complaints about data protection and the release of information.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate this complaint because Mr X appealed to the tribunal and because he can complain to the ICO.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings