London Borough of Newham (22 012 939)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Jan 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about two Penalty Charge Notices. This is because the complaint is late with no good reason to exercise discretion the investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr Y complained the Council has wrongly pursued him for two Penalty Charge Notices (PCNs) for a vehicle he no longer owned. Mr Y has now had to set up a payment plan with a bailiff, despite disputing that he owes any payment.
  2. Mr Y says this has caused him mental distress and financial difficulties.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Mr Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr Y received two PCNs for a vehicle he had previously sold in December 2020. He contacted the Council to complain. He also contacted the DVLA to update the vehicle registered keeper details. The DVLA confirmed the change, dated back to July 2020 in a letter dated February 2021. Mr Y provided this to the Council, but the Council said this information was not sufficient to transfer the liability for the PCNs and asked for further details. Mr Y then approached us in December 2022.

Analysis

  1. The law says people should normally complain to us within 12 months of becoming aware of an issue. Complaints brought to the Ombudsman more than 12 months after someone becomes aware of something a council has done are considered late. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons.
  2. Mr Y’s was aware of his reason to complain about the Council’s actions in December 2020 when he first became aware of the PCNs and when the Council refused to transfer liability, more than 12 months ago. Consequently, his complaint is now late.
  3. We have discretion to disapply the rule outlined in paragraph three where we decide there are good reasons. Mr Y has not provided any good reasons why he did not bring the complaint to us within 12 months of knowing about the matter, despite having been able to approach other bodies. It is reasonable to expect him to have complained to us sooner. Therefore we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr Y’s complaint because it is late with no good reasons to exercise discretion to investigate now.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings