City of York Council (22 010 898)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Nov 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council issued a penalty charge notice for parking in a restricted area. Mr X can reasonably use his right of appeal to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council issued a penalty charge notice (PCN) for parking in a residents permit zone. He says there were no signs or road markings indicating restricted parking. Mr X says he was a visitor to the town and the Council’s PCN portal makes it difficult to contest fines. He says he wants to appeal to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered the complainant’s comments and information. The information includes the Council’s letter, dated 7 November, rejecting his informal representations against the penalty charge notice (PCN).

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I will not investigate this complaint for the following reasons:
  2. The complaint is outside the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction because Mr X has a right of appeal to a tribunal (see paragraphs 2 and 3). The Traffic Penalty Tribunal considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for all areas of England outside London. The Council’s letter to Mr X correctly explains the procedure it is following which requires it to send a notice to owner if the PCN is not paid (due by around 21 November), formal representations, and a right of appeal to the Tribunal if rejected.
  3. It is reasonable for Mr X to use his right of appeal to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal which he says he wishes to do. The Tribunal’s parking adjudicator has the power to consider his arguments and quash the PCN. If Mr X has chosen to pay the discounted fine and not await the notice to owner that is the end of the matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council issued a penalty charge notice for parking in a restricted area. Mr X can reasonably use his right of appeal to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings