What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

London Borough of Harrow (22 010 623)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Nov 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to issue the complainant with a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN). This is because the complainant has already paid the PCN which effectively resolves her complaint.

The complaint

  1. In summary, Miss X complains about the Council’s decision to issue her with a PCN. She says she was forced to park illegally due to the Council’s failure to deal with people who had illegally parked on her road and used up the available parking spaces.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. London Tribunals (previously known as the Parking and Traffic Appeals Service) considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council responded to Miss X’s representations and explained she was issued with a PCN as she had parked with one wheel or more on the pavement. It said it could not cancel the PCN as it had been issued correctly. And if she wished to formally challenge it she could do at the next stage (and ultimately to London Tribunals).
  2. Parliament has laid down a detailed process allowing individuals the right to challenge receiving PCNs from the Council. If Miss X wished to challenge the PCN she should not have paid and instead formally appealed to London Tribunals. There is no procedure for paying and then appealing as payment effectively ends the appeal procedure.
  3. The Ombudsman can check if the Council responded to Miss X’s representations, and I note in this case it did. So there are no grounds for the Ombudsman to investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because she has already paid the PCN.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings