Rugby Borough Council (22 002 907)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Jun 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s disposal of land for housing development which has led to the loss of car parking space used by Mr X. This is because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to as Mr X, complains about the reasons and procedures used by the Council to dispose of land by lease that was a well-used and long-standing car park. As a result of the disposal, parking his family’s second car has become more difficult and access to the back of his house and road safety have been affected.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’ which we call ‘fault’. We cannot question whether an organisation’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  2. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant, including the Council’s response to his complaint.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X and other local residents used to use land owned by the Council to park their cars. The Council disposed of this land for housing development.
  2. Mr X complained to the Council that it had disposed of a public car park and that it had not done so in accordance with correct procedures or in line with earlier decisions it had taken about the land.
  3. The Council addressed Mr X’s complaint and confirmed the land had never been a public car park but instead it had been used by the public as an informal parking area. It said it had correctly disposed of the land in accordance with the relevant procedures. It did, however, recognise Mr X’s concerns and said it would work with him, councillors and the housing developer to try and resolve parking issues.
  4. While I understand Mr X is disappointed that he can no longer park his car in the area he had done, I have seen no evidence to suggest there has been fault by the Council.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings