West Northamptonshire Council (22 000 638)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 May 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about a penalty charge notice issued by the Council for a moving traffic contravention and subsequent action taken by bailiffs on behalf of the Council. The law provides a right of appeal to a tribunal against the charge and Ms X has used this right.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains she is unhappy the Council will not accept her payment for the original penalty charge notice (PCN) and that she did not receive letters sent to her about the moving traffic contravention before it had reached court and bailiffs were subsequently appointed.
  2. Ms X further complains she is suffering distress and illness and would like the Council to retract the debt from bailiffs or allow her to pay the amount of the original charge.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. The Traffic Penalty Tribunal considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for all areas of England outside London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council enforces moving traffic contraventions and takes recovery action using procedures set out in the Traffic Management Act 2004 and associated regulations. Councils and motorists must follow these procedures although councils have the discretion to stop enforcement or recovery action if they believe there are good reasons to do so.
  2. Ms X did not pay the penalty charge notice or make any representation to the Council. For this reason, the Council continued recovery action and registered the unpaid charge as a debt. This allowed the Council to use bailiffs to recover the unpaid penalty charge and associated costs from Ms X.
  3. Ms X had the right of appeal against the PCN to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal (TPT) which is a statutory tribunal. Ms X made a late statutory declaration to the TPT which was contested by the Council and then subsequently refused. Ms X could have made a further appeal against the case by submitting an appeal, commonly known as an N244, but no appeal of this kind has been lodged.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because she has exercised her right to submit a late appeal to the TPT and this was turned down. The restriction on our jurisdiction I describe in paragraph 2 applies.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings